I thought theIxneigh wrote:145 here. I chose medium experience. I won't be thoroughly familiar with the boat for years.
Lost a few points due to below average construction...for offshore work. No good vhf radio.
No 2nd reef point.
Ix
MacGregor rates "Above average seaworthyness"
- Phil M
- Captain
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:29 am
- Sailboat: Other
- Location: 44' Jeanneau, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Re: MacGregor rates "Above average seaworthyness"
- bscott
- Admiral
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 2:45 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Arvada, Colorado 2001 X, M rotating mast, E-tec 60 with Power Thruster, "HUFF n Puff"
Re: MacGregor rates "Above average seaworthyness"
MyPhil M wrote:I thought theIxneigh wrote:145 here. I chose medium experience. I won't be thoroughly familiar with the boat for years.
Lost a few points due to below average construction...for offshore work. No good vhf radio.
No 2nd reef point.
Ixreef was the equivalent of reef #2 on the X ? Anyone know?
I sail away from the dock double reefed and only shake out my reefs on a predicted low wind day and experience of the crew.
Contemplating adding a 3rd reef
Bob
Last edited by bscott on Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bscott
- Admiral
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 2:45 pm
- Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
- Location: Arvada, Colorado 2001 X, M rotating mast, E-tec 60 with Power Thruster, "HUFF n Puff"
Re: MacGregor rates "Above average seaworthyness"
4,225gabid wrote:122 for my. What is the displacement for a
?
Bob
