MikeFloutier wrote:I like the use of the diodes in 2. and the simplicity of the switches in 1. so I may try a hybrid version.
Both versions require the use of limit switches (which don't have to be on the actuator itself, by the way), but the use of diodes in the second version seems the simplest to me. It directly interrupts the output to the motor in the direction of travel, at or near the end of travel (set it back a bit if you don't want the nut to bottom out), but allows it to travel away from that end. Can't be any simpler, and shouldn't void any warranties as long as the limit switches are put outside the actuator rather than inside. Like on the arm it's driving. Or on a simple structure clamped to the actuator.
I'm not real clear on what the first one is doing, but it looks like it's interfacing the control board, presumably at the signal/control end rather than the power output. I'm not sure I'd want to be poking around in there.
We use limit switches as belt-and-suspenders [braces, for the UK] on things like crane boom max up and down travel, to back up the control system, which 'knows' where the boom is all the time, as the risk of catastrophic failure of the crane is very high in the event of a control failure or tampering by well-meaning but ham-fisted parts changers who shouldn't be in there in the first place. So we interrupt the actual valve driver signal directly, using mechanical limit switches with positive drive (will push right through and break welded contacts, if necessary, like real E-Stop switches).