Thank you,
Jacek


That is probably because there aren't many other 26' boats running a 50 HP engine. The smaller tanks carried off the boat gives you access to the "cheeper" very expensive gas at the gas station rather than having to buy the "very expensive" very expensive gas at the fuel docks.Moe wrote:My philosophy is that the Mac is a 26' boat and I know of no other boat that size using portable tanks. While others feel differently, and I respect that, I wouldn't want to try to carry 6 gallon tanks over the X transom, much less the M.
Scooting a plastic tank across a plastic bed liner is one of the "plastic fuel tank risks," but not the only one. The simple fact of high-speed fuel delivery into a plastic tank, given certain "dry" atmospheric conditions, can also induce static.Moe wrote: ... The problem with static comes from plastic tanks sliding around on a plastic truck bed liner ... the Mac is a 26' boat and I know of no other boat that size using portable tanks. While others feel differently, and I respect that, I wouldn't want to try to carry 6 gallon tanks over the X transom, much less the M.
[url=http://macgregorsailors.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=363&highlight=fire][u][b]Orig.Thread[/b][/u][/url] of Mar 2003 wrote:Somebody posted a Coast Guard reg that defines a "portable fuel tank" at a max of 6 gallons, for exactly the reasons you mentioned. Any tank larger than that is "supposed" to be a permanently mounted tank with attendant multiple requirements, venting & grounding (somewhere in archives). That much observed, probably half the Macs have 9 or 12 gallon tanks.
An industry trade group, the Petroleum Institute, wrote a report on plastic fuel-container fires. The basic problem is that gasoline molecules induce a static charge during delivery through the pumps, hose and especially while exiting the fueling nozzle. All commercial fueling systems are grounded, but fuel exiting the nozzle into the container builds static and the plastic container insulates it from natural grounding. The report quoted some recommendations for "avoiding plastic tank fueling fires." Sorry, I couldn't find that article any longer (somewhere in the archives).
Don's description sounds perfectly safe, matching the guidelines as I recall them.
1. Fill slowly, because high-speed delivery induces more static charge.
2. Keep the nozzle always in contact with the tank filler neck, and before breaking that contact ...
3. Immerse the nozzle into the liquid fuel before removing it from the container.
The critical problem happens if you permit the (grounded) nozzle to break contact from the container while in the highly explosive fumes at the fuel's surface, top of tank. A spark at that moment is a killer. These steps are intended to shunt any static charge to the nozzle's grounding system.
Referring to #2:Frank C wrote:[url=http://macgregorsailors.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=363&highlight=fire][u][b]Orig.Thread[/b][/u][/url] of Mar 2003 wrote:
Don's description sounds perfectly safe, matching the guidelines as I recall them.
1. Fill slowly, because high-speed delivery induces more static charge.
2. Keep the nozzle always in contact with the tank filler neck, and before breaking that contact ...
3. Immerse the nozzle into the liquid fuel before removing it from the container.
The critical problem happens if you permit the (grounded) nozzle to break contact from the container while in the highly explosive fumes at the fuel's surface, top of tank. A spark at that moment is a killer. These steps are intended to shunt any static charge to the nozzle's grounding system.