Wayne nicol wrote:
i do know though, that the deciding factor for buying my beautiful

was not the car tow deal, but rather the boats other characteristics.
I hear these rationalizations all the time, but the bottom line is that if the MAC26M was not trailer-able I doubt 70% of you would have bought it.
For all of you that think the MAC26M should be bigger I ask: "If the MAC26M required a slip would you all have still bought it?"
I doubt it. Why compromise the size if your not putting it on a trailer? The trailer feature IS the main feature. Take that away and you can change the whole boat dramatically to do a myriad of other things that traditional sailboats do. The whole concept of the trailer moves the customer base from the yacht club to the average Joe. Most people that slip a boat can afford a LOT more than a MAC, so guess what? They BUY a lot more! It's just a fact, if you can afford a slip you probably can afford more boat.
The people I listen to are the people that CAN afford more boat, yet they buy the MAC! There are a LOT of those types here on this blog site too, and also many people that do have big boats in slips, yet they still own a MAC too! I think they know something. I think Roger figured that out too - his dock in front of his house has a 70 foot boat on one side of the dock, and a black 26M on the other side.
If you are so bent on having 2 or 3 more feet of length and you have to pay to slip it anyways then why limit yourself to only 2 or 3 feet?? (It makes no sense). Do it right like a Catalina 29 with a good 10 foot beam! (But just TRY to get that on a trailer!)
Face it, OVER 50% of the design appeal of the MAC is the trailer-ability, and the other 40% is probably it's ability to plane at 20 MPH under power. If you want just a well performing sailboat on a trailer the MacGregor D boats are a good option, (maybe the best) - very fast under sail. But if you want power performance AND sailing the M boat is the only thing out there period and anything bigger is not going on a trailer pulled by anything less than a big rig.
The Potter is a good trailer boat, but no power boat option and it's small. It's better built, but why has the MAC outsold it 100 to 1? The trailer-able Beneteau sailboats really have only one feature over a MAC, the name: BENETEAU, but if your so hung up on a brand name you probably should bite the bullet and join the yacht club crowd, (although they will never accept you even in a BENETEAU because it's on a TRAILER!). Even the Benetea people say that boat is a prostitution of the company name.
There were SO many great trailer boats out there - what happened to all of them? I know, I used to have one of the 'other' boats and I can tell you why they failed and the MAC replaced them all. I like the honesty of the MAC - they don't claim to be some great PAC cruising high performance sailboat for the regatta crowd. Accepting the mantle of "Trailer Sailor" is part and parcel of the ownership bestowed on every buyer. They make no bones about it. The MAC does not claim or try to be anything other than what it is.
Trying to run away from the trailer legacy of the MAC is an embarrassment to the whole design and also questions your buying choice, one would need ask, "why make all those design compromises if it were not going to be on a trailer in the first place??"
It makes no sense.