Daggerboard Update

A forum for discussion of how to rig and tune your boat or kicker to achieve the best sailing performance.
User avatar
baldbaby2000
Admiral
Posts: 1382
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 8:41 am
Location: Rapid City, SD, 2005 26M, 40hp Tohatsu
Contact:

Post by baldbaby2000 »

I like the hose idea. I put some closed cell foam under it for tomorrow. Maybe I'll combine the 2. I'm not really too worried about the board. The bottom is about 2" thick fiberglass; above that is solid lead. After lowering it on the bar I checked for side-to-side movement and it seems negligible so I don't think I'll do anything special. If the boat and trailer move independently, I think the board will slide on the crossmember without causing too much stress on the trunk. My biggest concern would be a failure of the bar on the trailer so I'll keep the keel line slightly taut.

After owning 2 Mac 25's which have 650 lb keels that rest on the trailer, my 26M's 90 lbs seems rather tame. The Mac 25 keel was pretty sloppy in the trunk and I'm sure it bounced around much more than my 26M daggerboard will. The current owner of the Mac 25 is a very good friend of mine and after 20 years there is no noticable trunk wear.
User avatar
delevi
Admiral
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:03 am
Location: San Francisco Catalina 380, former 26M owner
Contact:

Post by delevi »

OK. The keel is finished and shipping today. 8) Here are some pics. The plastic edges at the top are the UHMW (very strong plastic) strips to avoid chips in the portion which is supported in the trunk. The total weight is 169 lbs with 147 lbs of lead in the bottom 14 inches. Can't Wait!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Leon
User avatar
Newell
First Officer
Posts: 439
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 1:42 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Layton, Utah, 96X Fast Sunday, 89D Windancer

180 lb db

Post by Newell »

delevi,

Looks like Ida Sailor has done a good job. Board appears great and looks deceptively lightweight. I quess it will be shipped freight.

I'm convinced the X needs more surface area exposed to the water, when I see how much larger the M board is in comparison.

Newell
Currently on Ocracoke Island NC
:D :macx:
User avatar
Newell
First Officer
Posts: 439
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 1:42 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Layton, Utah, 96X Fast Sunday, 89D Windancer

180 lb db

Post by Newell »

delevi,

Looks like Ida Sailor has done a good job. Board appears great and looks deceptively lightweight. I quess it will be shipped freight.

I'm convinced the X needs more surface area exposed to the water, when I see how much larger the M board is in comparison.

Newell
Currently on Ocracoke Island NC
:D :macx:
User avatar
Divecoz
Admiral
Posts: 3803
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:54 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: PORT CHARLOTTE FLORIDA 05 M Mercury 50 H.P. Big Foot Bill at Boats 4 Sail is my Hero

Re: 180 lb db

Post by Divecoz »

Newell wrote:delevi,

Looks like Ida Sailor has done a good job. Board appears great and looks deceptively lightweight. I quess it will be shipped freight.

I'm convinced the X needs more surface area exposed to the water, when I see how much larger the M board is in comparison.

Newell
Currently on Ocracoke Island NC
:D :macx:

I find the above very interesting as I . . .don't recall that coming up on this board before.
So I ask just how much smaller is the swing keel on the X than the board on the M ?
User avatar
Catigale
Site Admin
Posts: 10421
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:59 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Admiral .............Catigale 2002X.......Lots of Harpoon Hobie 16 Skiffs....Island 17
Contact:

Post by Catigale »

Just as an add-on, I measured the M daggerboard area as about 4 sq. ft and the X as 2.5 sq ft.
There goes the blue hull advantage.

I measured this by porting Rogers CAD output on his website into an integration program I wrote in COBOL with nested assembly, and checked it by measuring on my screen with a ruler, and got the same result.

Your area may vary.
User avatar
DLT
Admiral
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:24 am
Location: Kansas City 2005M 40hp ETEC

Post by DLT »

Boy, I sure hope it gets warm enough for Stephen to go sailing soon...
User avatar
Richard O'Brien
Captain
Posts: 653
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 8:20 am
Location: Lakewood, CO. Mercury 60hp bigfoot M0427B404

X centerboard improvements?

Post by Richard O'Brien »

I suppose this belongs in a new thread? :idea: I met a sailor last night who has a San Juan 21. He said that they came with vinyl tabs that cover the slot when centerboard is lowered, and that they have lasted for over 20 years. I wonder if something like that might help the X lower it's resistance? If I get to see his boat (he's in the same dry storage lot) I'll check it out?
Last edited by Richard O'Brien on Thu Apr 13, 2006 12:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
NautiMoments
Engineer
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 11:45 am
Location: Vancouver, BC "NautiMoments" 2005-26M....Honda 50

Post by NautiMoments »

Did you measure how many square feet are really in the water. I believe 12-16" stay in the trunk. May make those blue hulled :macm: s faster. Those Xs have a built in water brake (drag) system called the swing keel trunk. :D
At least the :macx: ers have a good knowledge at what the :macm: stern looks like when they are racing. 8)
User avatar
Scott
Admiral
Posts: 1654
Joined: Tue May 18, 2004 12:46 pm
Sailboat: Venture 25
Location: 1978 Catalina 22 with all the Racing Goodies!! 4 horse fire breathing monster on the transom

Post by Scott »

Cat said:
I measured this by porting Rogers CAD output on his website into an integration program I wrote in COBOL with nested assembly, and checked it by measuring on my screen with a ruler, and got the same result.
Yeah , ok whatever. How much stays in the boat on an M??

Engineers..............................Oh yeah, Lazer beam ray gun scientists too........
User avatar
Richard O'Brien
Captain
Posts: 653
Joined: Fri May 14, 2004 8:20 am
Location: Lakewood, CO. Mercury 60hp bigfoot M0427B404

Post by Richard O'Brien »

DLT wrote:Boy, I sure hope it gets warm enough for Stephen to go sailing soon...
:D :D :D
User avatar
Chip Hindes
Admiral
Posts: 2166
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 6:13 am
Location: West Sand Lake, NY '01X, "Nextboat" 50HP Tohatsu

Post by Chip Hindes »

At least the Xers have a good knowledge at what the M stern looks like when they are racing.
Actually, never seen one. Is it similar to that of the X?

I know the only M I've ever been out with has a pretty good idea what mine looks like. BTW, it looks the same when when the Tohatsu's cookin' (except smaller; perspective, you know) as it does when it's sailing.

Probably why the Ms need the extra windows in front, so they can better see who they're chasin'
User avatar
DLT
Admiral
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:24 am
Location: Kansas City 2005M 40hp ETEC

Post by DLT »

Chip Hindes wrote:Probably why the Ms need the extra windows in front, so they can better see who they're chasin'
Nice dig... And we certainly had that coming given the earlier inference...

But, the M doesn't have extra windows in the front, only on the side... I guess that's so we can get a better look at you while we're passing you, it all happens soo quick you see....
User avatar
Chip Hindes
Admiral
Posts: 2166
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 6:13 am
Location: West Sand Lake, NY '01X, "Nextboat" 50HP Tohatsu

Post by Chip Hindes »

You mean those double stacked windows in the front are fake?
User avatar
DLT
Admiral
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:24 am
Location: Kansas City 2005M 40hp ETEC

Post by DLT »

Yeah, there are only two front facing windows...
Post Reply