Adding LiON to existing system

A forum for discussing boat or trailer repairs or modifications that you have made or are considering.
User avatar
Starscream
Admiral
Posts: 1524
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:08 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Montreal, Quebec. 2002 26X - Suzi DF90A

Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Starscream »

I've always wanted to go to Lithium Ion batteries for the power/weight/longevity benifits, but they don't have the CCA for my motor. I also want to increase my solar from 100W to 200W, and I'll make another thread about that. My current system looks like this (yes there are a bunch of other fuses and breakers not shown):

Image

What I came up with, for minimum changes to the existing system, is to wire the solar directly to a 100AH lithium battery, and then that battery to a DC-DC charge controller that connects to one of the original two batteries where the original solar charge controller connected. That way, whatever solar energy is produced is funnelled into both lead-acid batteries (via the ACR for the 2nd battery). It will be set-and-forget battery control, so I'll never have to think about the battery selector unless both the Lion battery AND one lead acid battery are completely discharged, which means we ate almost 180AH of energy. The only downside I see is that the engine won't charge the Lion battery in this scenario:

Image
No changes required to the existing system other than disconnecting the solar charge controller and reconnecting the DC to DC in the same place. That's a big benefit, too, because I hate!!! wiring on the ol' X.

Am I being dumb? Is this how a DC to DC charger works? If the Lion is discharged, but the Lead Acid are charged, is there a diode that prevents backfeeding the Lion, or are these chargers two-way? As usual feedback is greatly appreciated even if it's just to tell me I'm an idiot.
User avatar
rsvpasap
First Officer
Posts: 207
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 2:05 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by rsvpasap »

Pretty sure you would prefer lifepo4 batteries, not LiON, as LiON batteries are generally more expensive, have a shorter lifespan and are more prone to fire. Lifepo4 are safer, cheaper and last longer.

Verify your solar charger is MPPT, not PWM.

Otherwise, your proposed setup should work fine.

(I have a 2002 26X, 550w solar, 600 AH batteries, etc. While I have an ACR and battery selector to separate out a starting battery, in practice, I keep my batteries connected as a single bank and carry a jump starter pack just in case. In the attached diagram, I previously had an Efoy 80 for many years, but recently removed it.)


Image
User avatar
Starscream
Admiral
Posts: 1524
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:08 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Montreal, Quebec. 2002 26X - Suzi DF90A

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Starscream »

rsvpasap wrote: Thu Jul 25, 2024 7:48 am Pretty sure you would prefer lifepo4 batteries, not LiON, as LiON batteries are generally more expensive, have a shorter lifespan and are more prone to fire. Lifepo4 are safer, cheaper and last longer.

Verify your solar charger is MPPT, not PWM.

Otherwise, your proposed setup should work fine.

(I have a 2002 26X, 550w solar, 600 AH batteries, etc. While I have an ACR and battery selector to separate out a starting battery, in practice, I keep my batteries connected as a single bank and carry a jump starter pack just in case. In the attached diagram, I previously had an Efoy 80 for many years, but recently removed it.)


Image
Wow, that's quite a comfortable setup!!!. 12V hot water on a Mac is awesome. I always suspected that a 100AH lithium battery could crank my 90HP, but I wrote an email to a battery company (I think it was Battleborne or Dakota) and they flat out said no you can't do that.

I haven't researched the parts yet, but LiFEPo4 is now high on the list of requirements. My current solar is already MPPT, but I may just replace it with one from the battery company that I choose, just to be 100% sure that a $100 Amazon controller doesn't mess something up.

Thanks for the feedback, it makes me feel a bit better about my planning. I had a chat online with a Renogy agent but they were a bit clueless sadly. She did confirm that the DC to DC charger is appropriate for charging a house bank from a lithium battery.
User avatar
Be Free
Admiral
Posts: 1623
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:08 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Steinhatchee, FL

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Be Free »

Some DC-DC chargers can go both ways without rewiring or reprogramming but most of them are meant to only charge in one direction.

It's not exactly the way I'd do it but there is nothing wrong with your design. It will work.

LiFePO4 is the only lithium house battery you should have on a boat.
Bill
2001 26X Simple Interest
Honda BF40D
"If I were in a hurry I would not have bought a sailboat." Me
User avatar
Starscream
Admiral
Posts: 1524
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:08 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Montreal, Quebec. 2002 26X - Suzi DF90A

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Starscream »

Be Free wrote: Thu Jul 25, 2024 1:43 pm Some DC-DC chargers can go both ways without rewiring or reprogramming but most of them are meant to only charge in one direction.

It's not exactly the way I'd do it but there is nothing wrong with your design. It will work.

LiFePO4 is the only lithium house battery you should have on a boat.
Thanks for the feedback, it really helps. I realize it's an unusual setup but the more I think about it the more I like it. The only disadvantage that I see is that the LiFePo4 battery is only charged by solar, not by shore power or the alternator. Considering going to a 350W panel that I have left over from our house solar installation project. With 350W of solar, we could probably get about 2kwhr of energy on a sunny day and about 0.5kwhr on a cloudier day.

The advantages are: set the battery selector and forget it. All charging happens automatically to all batteries, no matter what the source is. No worries about which battery to use to start the motor; wherever the selector is, that battery will start it. If we don't run through the lithium battery in a day, technically my house loads will be Li powered, as the lead acid shouldn't draw down at all before the Li battery reaches about 9V. That should prolong the battery life and reduce full-discharge situations. Maybe the best advantage is that I don't have to make major changes to the existing system.

Maybe in the future I'll want to add a shore-power charger for the Li battery, or figure out a way to get the motor alternator to charge it too, but I feel like I might end up with the equivalent of circular-reference error if I go to far.
User avatar
Be Free
Admiral
Posts: 1623
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:08 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Steinhatchee, FL

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Be Free »

Starscream wrote: Thu Jul 25, 2024 4:42 pm
Thanks for the feedback, it really helps. I realize it's an unusual setup but the more I think about it the more I like it. The only disadvantage that I see is that the LiFePo4 battery is only charged by solar, not by shore power or the alternator. Considering going to a 350W panel that I have left over from our house solar installation project. With 350W of solar, we could probably get about 2kwhr of energy on a sunny day and about 0.5kwhr on a cloudier day.
If you can make it fit, the 350W panel is probably a good idea. I think 2KWh may be a little optimistic even on the longest day of the year where you are but it's not impossible.

If you can leave your panel operational when the boat is parked at home them you could do without a shore power source for it. If you can't leave the panel up at home then you should have a way to make sure that your LiFePO4 battery is charged via shore power. Starting a trip with your batteries already depleted is not optimal.
Starscream wrote: Thu Jul 25, 2024 4:42 pm The advantages are: set the battery selector and forget it. All charging happens automatically to all batteries, no matter what the source is. No worries about which battery to use to start the motor; wherever the selector is, that battery will start it. If we don't run through the lithium battery in a day, technically my house loads will be Li powered, as the lead acid shouldn't draw down at all before the Li battery reaches about 9V. That should prolong the battery life and reduce full-discharge situations. Maybe the best advantage is that I don't have to make major changes to the existing system.
Yes, technically your house loads will be LI powered, but not without some losses. Looking from the viewpoint of the load, it does not matter if the voltage is coming from the battery charger, the ACR, the FLA battery, or the DC-DC charger. "Volts is volts." Any load connected directly to the Pb batteries has no additional loss. The loss comes from the fact that the LI battery cannot directly supply the house loads. It has to pass through the DC-DC charger first. If you can believe the vendors, you should expect 5-10% loss in the conversion. That's not a terrible loss but it's not trivial.

"Set it and forget it" is tempting and your current design will keep the Pb batteries charged regardless but as you've already noted, the LI will only charge via solar. No sun, no LI (eventually).

I had a different priority in my design. I'm often a long way from everything and I never want to wake up in the morning to a dead start battery or blow my alternator diodes by disconnecting the battery accidentally. My engine is connected to my start battery and my house bank is connected to my DC bus. Both share independent charge sources via an ACR (like you have). Either can charge the other; neither can drain the other. For now it's all FLA so I don't have to deal with different voltages and charge profiles but I would not be surprised if a LI house bank might be in my future the next time I need to replace it.
Starscream wrote: Thu Jul 25, 2024 4:42 pm
Maybe in the future I'll want to add a shore-power charger for the Li battery, or figure out a way to get the motor alternator to charge it too, but I feel like I might end up with the equivalent of circular-reference error if I go to far.
I think you are going to want some way to charge the LI battery from shore power. LI batteries are not as picky about staying charged as Pb batteries are but you should have a way to charge them at the dock or at home. Best case: solar only works half of the time.

The only way I see you using the alternator to charge the LI battery is if you get one of the DC-DC chargers that are designed to be reversed. I think you are asking for trouble if you try to hook up two of them at the same time. The electrical equivalent of a circular-reference error sometimes goes BOOM!

I think that (long term) you probably want to have a LI house bank (1 or more batteries) and a single Pb start battery. That is something you can gradually work toward as the existing Pb batteries age out. Use a DC-DC charger if you want to allow the alternator to charge the LI bank. Solar would still charge the house (LI) bank but only the alternator charges the start battery. Carry a booster pack if you are worried about a dead start battery.

Bottom line, what you have proposed will probably work fine but the devil is in the details. Have you run an energy budget to actually estimate you energy usage? If the sun is shining, you will probably have more power than you are consuming on most days. At night you will always be running a deficit. The power you have available for charging is only what is produced in excess of what you are using at that instant.
Bill
2001 26X Simple Interest
Honda BF40D
"If I were in a hurry I would not have bought a sailboat." Me
User avatar
Starscream
Admiral
Posts: 1524
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:08 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Montreal, Quebec. 2002 26X - Suzi DF90A

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Starscream »

Thank you so much for this detailed reply, Bill. I feel like you're my technical mentor for Mac-ideas. I really appreciate the time you took to answer.
Be Free wrote: Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:38 pm
If you can make it fit, the 350W panel is probably a good idea. I think 2KWh may be a little optimistic even on the longest day of the year where you are but it's not impossible.
The 350W panel would fit nicely on a "dinghy davit" type arch hanging off the back. I made up a design for the arch using bimini fittings and 1" x 3/32 aluminum tubing, but I'm not 100% solid on the design. Right now I'm thinking that each vertical tube will be mounted to the stern using two 90-degree deck mounts, the bottom one for the tube socket end and the higher one attached to a 1" eye slide. To be determined. The 2kwhr came from a quick calculation on my home system, where 8.5kW of panels produces 50kwhr on a good day. Of course there is zero shading on the home panels, so the 2kWhr guess will definitely be reduced by the mast, boom and sails. Also the home panels are at a good angle, whereas the boat panel will be flat, which is not as good at my lattitude. Maybe I have to make the davits adjustable but I think that may be outside my skill range.

One concern that I have about going to 1 panel is that it will be much more susceptible to shade than the two panels in parallel that I have now.
Be Free wrote: Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:38 pm
If you can leave your panel operational when the boat is parked at home them you could do without a shore power source for it. If you can't leave the panel up at home then you should have a way to make sure that your LiFePO4 battery is charged via shore power. Starting a trip with your batteries already depleted is not optimal.
Very good point. The boat's in the marina most of the summer, but I will want to charge it at home. I park up against a garden shed that also is solar powered, and it would be very easy to run a line from the "load" terminal of its charge controller over to the back of the boat.
Be Free wrote: Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:38 pm Yes, technically your house loads will be LI powered, but not without some losses. Looking from the viewpoint of the load, it does not matter if the voltage is coming from the battery charger, the ACR, the FLA battery, or the DC-DC charger. "Volts is volts." Any load connected directly to the Pb batteries has no additional loss. The loss comes from the fact that the LI battery cannot directly supply the house loads. It has to pass through the DC-DC charger first. If you can believe the vendors, you should expect 5-10% loss in the conversion. That's not a terrible loss but it's not trivial.
Also a very good point, and one that I hadn't thought about at all. That will derate the Li AH capacity, but I think I'll just have to plan for that.

Be Free wrote: Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:38 pm "Set it and forget it" is tempting and your current design will keep the Pb batteries charged regardless but as you've already noted, the LI will only charge via solar. No sun, no LI (eventually).

I had a different priority in my design. I'm often a long way from everything and I never want to wake up in the morning to a dead start battery or blow my alternator diodes by disconnecting the battery accidentally. My engine is connected to my start battery and my house bank is connected to my DC bus. Both share independent charge sources via an ACR (like you have). Either can charge the other; neither can drain the other. For now it's all FLA so I don't have to deal with different voltages and charge profiles but I would not be surprised if a LI house bank might be in my future the next time I need to replace it.
Yeah, I love the set and forget aspect of the current system. At the beginning of each season I choose whether I'm going to use battery 1 or battery 2 for the whole year. Don't have to switch it unless it's totally depleted. Full depletion of one battery is starting to happen regularly to us now: 5 cellphones fast-charging, a movie at night on a 24" FireTV, fridge, pressurized water system, cockpit and interior lights burns through 66AH in less than one night. On our last trip, we woke up to a dead battery each morning, but by 9:30am the 100W of solar had recharged it enough to start the motor and I never had to switch to the second battery. I carry a Noco lithium jump starter just in case, which we've used to assist in a "rescue" before.

Be Free wrote: Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:38 pm
The only way I see you using the alternator to charge the LI battery is if you get one of the DC-DC chargers that are designed to be reversed. I think you are asking for trouble if you try to hook up two of them at the same time. The electrical equivalent of a circular-reference error sometimes goes BOOM!
HAHAHAHAH yeah

Be Free wrote: Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:38 pm I think that (long term) you probably want to have a LI house bank (1 or more batteries) and a single Pb start battery. That is something you can gradually work toward as the existing Pb batteries age out. Use a DC-DC charger if you want to allow the alternator to charge the LI bank. Solar would still charge the house (LI) bank but only the alternator charges the start battery. Carry a booster pack if you are worried about a dead start battery.
Agree. I really wanted to convert entirely to Lithium but nothing was available last year when I started the research. I don't want to go to a starting/house setup where I need to choose which battery to use, or where I have to worry about charging Li and FLA from the same source. Yesterday I found these Li starting/dual purpose batteries from Dakota, which are a good surprise. I'd love to see them at 100AH instead of 60, then I could just use 2 of these and have done with it.

https://dakotalithium.com/product/dakot ... y-1000cca/
Be Free wrote: Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:38 pm Bottom line, what you have proposed will probably work fine but the devil is in the details. Have you run an energy budget to actually estimate you energy usage? If the sun is shining, you will probably have more power than you are consuming on most days. At night you will always be running a deficit. The power you have available for charging is only what is produced in excess of what you are using at that instant.
Yes, we use 50 to 60 AH on a typical night of using power like it came from an infinite source. Enough to drain an 8-year old Optima blue-top 66AH battery by about 5am. That's where I came up with the idea of an additional 50 to 100 AH Li battery to get us through the night.
Last edited by Starscream on Sun Jul 28, 2024 9:50 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
kurz
Admiral
Posts: 1244
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:07 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Zürich, Switzerland, Europe

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by kurz »

Just my setup, second season no problems so far:

To save weight and kip it simple, I use just ONE Battery for starting the OB and for the rest of use.

I installed a LifeYpo4 WINSTON 60Ah battery. No change with OB loading system. No change with my 100W solar system.

Works perfect. All time enough power for fridge, mobiles...

Load and use in hottest summer and frozen winter...

The esyest installation!
No Electronics in the battery that can get lost other will disconnect the battery from the Motor.
User avatar
Be Free
Admiral
Posts: 1623
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:08 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Steinhatchee, FL

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Be Free »

Kurtz,
It sounds like you are using a drop-in 12v lithium battery. I'm pretty sure that the Dakota Lithium battery that Starscream mentioned in his last post is one as well.

I know that the Dakota Lithium is around $10/Ah (assuming 100% discharge) but the current cost of the FLA deep cycle batteries I use are under $3/Ah (assuming 50% discharge). I'm getting 215Ah (usable) and a dedicated start battery for about what the Dakota Lithium costs. They all charge from the same sources as well.

Granted, you have a much simpler setup and significantly less weight. When the time comes to replace my current FLA house bank I will be looking at LiFePO4 in all of it's variations. Getting back the space and weight is very tempting although that extra 240 pounds under the aft settee does make my starboard tacks more stable. I may miss that part.

I'm interested to see how your setup continues to work for you. What was the cost per Ah for your setup? How much do you use under normal conditions (I'm normally around 90 - 100 Ah over a 24 hr period). How long does it take to recharge?

Thanks,
Bill
Bill
2001 26X Simple Interest
Honda BF40D
"If I were in a hurry I would not have bought a sailboat." Me
User avatar
Be Free
Admiral
Posts: 1623
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:08 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Steinhatchee, FL

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Be Free »

Starscream,
Thanks for the kind words.

I don't have any experience with the battery you linked to or the company that makes it. It appears to be what is generally referred to as a "drop-in" lithium battery. They are meant to simplify the transition from the various lead based batteries to lithium. As I understand them you might consider them the "Macs" of lithium batteries. They have made some compromises in their design that makes it easier for them to live in the Pb ecosystem just like our boats have to make some compromises to be able to move between the sail and power worlds. The changes are relatively minor and don't make that much difference in the long run. If the ease of "dropping in" a lithium battery where a lead battery used to be is important then the design changes are worth it.

Depending on how long you have been switching your house and start functions on your battery bank this next part might be moot but it may be of interest to others in the future in any case.

One quick disclaimer: I'm going to use voltage as a proxy for the depth of discharge of the battery. This would only actually work if you let the battery "rest" with no load on it for a while (say an hour) before you measured the voltage. The voltage when the battery is under load is always going to be lower than the resting voltage (sometimes quite a bit lower).

The only way to accurately measure depth of discharge (DOD) is to measure the actual capacity of the battery (not easy), fully charge it, and then measure the amperage and time while it is under load. There are gauges that will give a good approximation of the DOD if you program them correctly but most people don't (program them correctly).

For something that is "close enough for government work" you can assume the capacity is what it says on the battery (de-rated if the battery is not new) and then measure the amps and time to get the Amp hours. 25 Ah out of a 100Ah battery is 25% discharged. Now, back to our story.

Lead acid batteries do not like to be deeply discharged and they really hate to stay that way. They also hate it when you don't charge them up all the way.

Every time you take your batteries down below 50% you shorten their life measurably. A fully charged battery is a little over 12.6V. You will hit the 50% mark right around 12V. Ballpark numbers: if you discharge your battery 25% (around 12.3V) and charge it back up immediately your battery will last about twice as long as it would if you discharge it 50% (around 12V). Around 25% is a good target if you want to maximize battery life and minimize cost per battery cycle (discharge/charge cycle). Below 50% and you are hurting the battery more than the extra Amp hours are helping you.

You said you were killing your batteries overnight so let's assume you were hitting (at least) 50% discharge. You also said that you would choose one battery for the firing squad --- I mean the house bank for the entire season. This is good if your plan was to be sure you had a battery to start the outboard the next morning but not so good for the victim. It is a "good" idea as long as you are not doing it to try to "even the wear" on the batteries or something along those lines. I made the same mistake when I started. If you pulled the selected battery down below 50% multiple times over the season you may have seriously decreased it's life expectancy.

Remember, the life of the battery is directly related to how deep you discharge it. If you take it to 50% it will wear out about 2x faster than if you take it to 25%. So, if instead of using the batteries one at a time, you used your Perko switch to combine them (ALL) the exact same load would pull down your combined battery to 25% instead of 50%. Your batteries now last twice as long under the same load.

"But wait!", you say. They last twice as long but I'm using twice as many batteries so I have not gained anything.

That's sort of true, but I have not told you the rest of the story. First of all, you will get a little better than a 2x improvement but that's not the important part. The other side is the fact that lead batteries don't like to stay discharged (see above) and they don't like to be partially charged on a regular basis.

To bring a lead battery from 50% to 80% in our hypothetical 100Ah battery would require 30Ah to be replaced. Because of the peculiarities of the chemistry, the battery really prefers to be charged at around 20% of it's capacity when it's deeply discharged. It is unlikely that you have an outboard that has 20A of charge capacity (some do, most don't) and even if you did you probably don't want to run your outboard for 90 minutes to charge the battery (assuming no losses). With the right controller you might get that from your solar panel (350W) on a good day.

Another peculiarity of lead batteries is that it will take a lot longer to charge the battery from 80% to 100% than it did to charge it from 50% to 80%. Fortunately, the battery will be mostly content if you can get it to 80% on most days. This implies that our minimum target should be to get the battery to 80% on most days and 100% when possible.

Here's the trick. Instead of taking one battery down to 50% then back to 80% (or more) you take two batteries down to 75% then back to 80% (or more). It takes the same amount of power (50Ah) to get them fully charged, but it takes 30Ah to get a single battery to the minimum of 80% but it only takes 10Ah to get two batteries to the same point. Now it only takes your 20A alternator 30 minutes to get your batteries charged back to 80% instead of 90 minutes to get the single battery charged.

On the plus side: Your batteries get back to 80% faster. You never get close to the 50% "cliff" where battery life really starts dropping off.
On the minus side: You need to have another way of starting your engine if you manage to kill both batteries somehow.

And on the major plus side: If your discharge is only to 40% (20 from each battery), you will increase your battery life to around 3X to 50% rate and your batteries never go below the magic 80% point.

Unfortunately, there may be a major minus as well: If you have been regularly killing one of your house batteries, even you you've been alternating it by year, you may have decreased their life expectancy. Your comments indicated that they seem to have decreased their capacity as well. Your 100Ah house batteries may be something less, maybe a lot less. It's a vicious cycle. The over-discharged battery loses capacity so even under a lesser load it still get over-discharged and looses more capacity.

Given their relatively small Ah rating I'm going to assume that these are "Marine deep cycle" batteries. If that is the case, they have a normal life expectancy of 3-5 years. Deep cycle batteries are considered "worn out" when they can no longer deliver at least 80% of their rated capacity. Best case: you need to de-rate your battery's capacity 4Ah per year. If it's 3 years old it is probably (at best) 88Ah.

It is very late here and I'm going to quit before I make a math mistake (assuming I have not already made one).
Bill
2001 26X Simple Interest
Honda BF40D
"If I were in a hurry I would not have bought a sailboat." Me
User avatar
kurz
Admiral
Posts: 1244
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:07 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Zürich, Switzerland, Europe

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by kurz »

Be Free wrote: Sat Jul 27, 2024 10:05 pm Kurtz,




Granted, you have a much simpler setup and significantly less weight. When the time comes to replace my current FLA house bank I will be looking at LiFePO4 in all of it's variations. Getting back the space and weight is very tempting although that extra 240 pounds under the aft settee does make my starboard tacks more stable. I may miss that part.

I'm interested to see how your setup continues to work for you. What was the cost per Ah for your setup? How much do you use under normal conditions (I'm normally around 90 - 100 Ah over a 24 hr period). How long does it take to recharge?

Thanks,
Bill
https://faktor.de/batterien/batterien-1 ... eypo4.html
This is my Winston lifeYPo4. they go until 90Ah.
It is not the cheapest. But best quality. The cells are selected, so you need no balancer. NO electronic inside. It will NEVER shut off. You can load till 16V, but staying deeper is better. So 14 to 15V like the OBs do fits. You can use it in freezing winter too!
Maybe not be the cheapest. BUT: If you count all he gimmicks you need for a dual system with lead, and all the extra LiFePo chargers and switches... Und for me it was the cheapest, the easiest and the lightest on the trailer.
User avatar
Be Free
Admiral
Posts: 1623
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:08 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Steinhatchee, FL

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Be Free »

Kurz,
I've heard good things about the Winston batteries. They are a little more expensive per Ah than the one that Starscream referenced but an actual Winston is a much better build quality. The key is the carefully matched cells. If they are actually matched the Winston is a good choice but there are counterfeits out there. Caveat emptor.

Running a dual Li-Pb environment is messy if you want them to share charge sources. I'll probably always use a lead battery for starting but I expect that my house bank will be 100% lithium after the current bank get to end of life. I don't plan on having them share charging sources.
Bill
2001 26X Simple Interest
Honda BF40D
"If I were in a hurry I would not have bought a sailboat." Me
User avatar
Starscream
Admiral
Posts: 1524
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:08 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Montreal, Quebec. 2002 26X - Suzi DF90A

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Starscream »

Be Free wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2024 12:21 am Starscream,
Thanks for the kind words.

I don't have any experience with the battery you linked to or the company that makes it. It appears to be what is generally referred to as a "drop-in" lithium battery. They are meant to simplify the transition from the various lead based batteries to lithium. As I understand them you might consider them the "Macs" of lithium batteries. They have made some compromises in their design that makes it easier for them to live in the Pb ecosystem just like our boats have to make some compromises to be able to move between the sail and power worlds. The changes are relatively minor and don't make that much difference in the long run. If the ease of "dropping in" a lithium battery where a lead battery used to be is important then the design changes are worth it.

Depending on how long you have been switching your house and start functions on your battery bank this next part might be moot but it may be of interest to others in the future in any case.

One quick disclaimer: I'm going to use voltage as a proxy for the depth of discharge of the battery. This would only actually work if you let the battery "rest" with no load on it for a while (say an hour) before you measured the voltage. The voltage when the battery is under load is always going to be lower than the resting voltage (sometimes quite a bit lower).

The only way to accurately measure depth of discharge (DOD) is to measure the actual capacity of the battery (not easy), fully charge it, and then measure the amperage and time while it is under load. There are gauges that will give a good approximation of the DOD if you program them correctly but most people don't (program them correctly).

For something that is "close enough for government work" you can assume the capacity is what it says on the battery (de-rated if the battery is not new) and then measure the amps and time to get the Amp hours. 25 Ah out of a 100Ah battery is 25% discharged. Now, back to our story.

Lead acid batteries do not like to be deeply discharged and they really hate to stay that way. They also hate it when you don't charge them up all the way.

Every time you take your batteries down below 50% you shorten their life measurably. A fully charged battery is a little over 12.6V. You will hit the 50% mark right around 12V. Ballpark numbers: if you discharge your battery 25% (around 12.3V) and charge it back up immediately your battery will last about twice as long as it would if you discharge it 50% (around 12V). Around 25% is a good target if you want to maximize battery life and minimize cost per battery cycle (discharge/charge cycle). Below 50% and you are hurting the battery more than the extra Amp hours are helping you.

You said you were killing your batteries overnight so let's assume you were hitting (at least) 50% discharge. You also said that you would choose one battery for the firing squad --- I mean the house bank for the entire season. This is good if your plan was to be sure you had a battery to start the outboard the next morning but not so good for the victim. It is a "good" idea as long as you are not doing it to try to "even the wear" on the batteries or something along those lines. I made the same mistake when I started. If you pulled the selected battery down below 50% multiple times over the season you may have seriously decreased it's life expectancy.

Remember, the life of the battery is directly related to how deep you discharge it. If you take it to 50% it will wear out about 2x faster than if you take it to 25%. So, if instead of using the batteries one at a time, you used your Perko switch to combine them (ALL) the exact same load would pull down your combined battery to 25% instead of 50%. Your batteries now last twice as long under the same load.

"But wait!", you say. They last twice as long but I'm using twice as many batteries so I have not gained anything.

That's sort of true, but I have not told you the rest of the story. First of all, you will get a little better than a 2x improvement but that's not the important part. The other side is the fact that lead batteries don't like to stay discharged (see above) and they don't like to be partially charged on a regular basis.

To bring a lead battery from 50% to 80% in our hypothetical 100Ah battery would require 30Ah to be replaced. Because of the peculiarities of the chemistry, the battery really prefers to be charged at around 20% of it's capacity when it's deeply discharged. It is unlikely that you have an outboard that has 20A of charge capacity (some do, most don't) and even if you did you probably don't want to run your outboard for 90 minutes to charge the battery (assuming no losses). With the right controller you might get that from your solar panel (350W) on a good day.

Another peculiarity of lead batteries is that it will take a lot longer to charge the battery from 80% to 100% than it did to charge it from 50% to 80%. Fortunately, the battery will be mostly content if you can get it to 80% on most days. This implies that our minimum target should be to get the battery to 80% on most days and 100% when possible.

Here's the trick. Instead of taking one battery down to 50% then back to 80% (or more) you take two batteries down to 75% then back to 80% (or more). It takes the same amount of power (50Ah) to get them fully charged, but it takes 30Ah to get a single battery to the minimum of 80% but it only takes 10Ah to get two batteries to the same point. Now it only takes your 20A alternator 30 minutes to get your batteries charged back to 80% instead of 90 minutes to get the single battery charged.

On the plus side: Your batteries get back to 80% faster. You never get close to the 50% "cliff" where battery life really starts dropping off.
On the minus side: You need to have another way of starting your engine if you manage to kill both batteries somehow.

And on the major plus side: If your discharge is only to 40% (20 from each battery), you will increase your battery life to around 3X to 50% rate and your batteries never go below the magic 80% point.

Unfortunately, there may be a major minus as well: If you have been regularly killing one of your house batteries, even you you've been alternating it by year, you may have decreased their life expectancy. Your comments indicated that they seem to have decreased their capacity as well. Your 100Ah house batteries may be something less, maybe a lot less. It's a vicious cycle. The over-discharged battery loses capacity so even under a lesser load it still get over-discharged and looses more capacity.

Given their relatively small Ah rating I'm going to assume that these are "Marine deep cycle" batteries. If that is the case, they have a normal life expectancy of 3-5 years. Deep cycle batteries are considered "worn out" when they can no longer deliver at least 80% of their rated capacity. Best case: you need to de-rate your battery's capacity 4Ah per year. If it's 3 years old it is probably (at best) 88Ah.

It is very late here and I'm going to quit before I make a math mistake (assuming I have not already made one).
Again...I love being educated! The way I used my battery system was far from optimum for battery longevity, but my Optima batteries have held up to my abuse relatively well.

The Optima Blue top AGM 66AH/1000CCA deep cycle batteries that I put in 8 years ago were a good match for my power consumption up until this year. I don't think we ever drew the operational battery down below 50% in our last 8 years. But this year we added refrigeration. And a TV and inverter. And cockpit lighting. And data plans for the kids cellphones. This year is the first time that we ever woke up without energy left in the house battery; a combination of much more usage and age, I suppose. I didn't explain the whole story about how I use the batteries: for the last few years I've used battery #1 exclusively, out of laziness, habit, and the desire to have one "good" battery in reserve. I just took out the Optimas and replaced them with Costco deep cycle 80AH "marine" batteries with 550 CCA. I sold battery #1 to a fellow who brought a tester and rated it at 81% of original capacity, and battery #2 went into the solar shed bank. Battery #1 was drawn down to nothing probably 10 times in its life, and Battery # 2 was almost never discharged very deeply. Costco batteries were pretty cheap, so it didn't cost much after I sold the Optima.

Continuing my research, I found these:
https://dakotalithium.com/product/dl-pl ... rformance/

Lithium LiFEPO4 Dual purpose deep cycle/starting batteries, 11 year warranty, charger included, 1000CCA, 135AH, 27.2 lbs, group 24 sizing, -20F operation (for winter storage IN the boat). Seems like the perfect battery for me.

Problem is that they're $1189 USD each. That comes out to over $3k cdn if I want to make that switch. That's big boat-money, but maybe it's worth it to have a 270AH system that's truly set-and-forget with very little concern over deep discharging.
User avatar
Hamin' X
Site Admin
Posts: 3462
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:02 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Hermiston, OR-----------2001 26X DF-50 Suz---------------(Now Sold)
Contact:

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Hamin' X »

Starscream wrote: Mon Jul 29, 2024 8:01 amLithium LiFEPO4 Dual purpose deep cycle/starting batteries, 11 year warranty, charger included, 1000CCA, 135AH, 27.2 lbs, group 24 sizing, -20F operation (for winter storage IN the boat). Seems like the perfect battery for me.

Problem is that they're $1189 USD each. That comes out to over $3k cdn if I want to make that switch. That's big boat-money, but maybe it's worth it to have a 270AH system that's truly set-and-forget with very little concern over deep discharging.
Try one of these for the starter battery.

https://www.amazon.com/LiFePO4-Start-St ... Z192/?th=1
~Rich---Hamin' X---N7ZH~
User avatar
Starscream
Admiral
Posts: 1524
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:08 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Montreal, Quebec. 2002 26X - Suzi DF90A

Re: Adding LiON to existing system

Post by Starscream »

Hamin' X wrote: Mon Jul 29, 2024 9:32 am
Starscream wrote: Mon Jul 29, 2024 8:01 amLithium LiFEPO4 Dual purpose deep cycle/starting batteries, 11 year warranty, charger included, 1000CCA, 135AH, 27.2 lbs, group 24 sizing, -20F operation (for winter storage IN the boat). Seems like the perfect battery for me.

Problem is that they're $1189 USD each. That comes out to over $3k cdn if I want to make that switch. That's big boat-money, but maybe it's worth it to have a 270AH system that's truly set-and-forget with very little concern over deep discharging.
Try one of these for the starter battery.

https://www.amazon.com/LiFePO4-Start-St ... Z192/?th=1
Interesting...the stats there look awesome. I just can't bring myself to buy stuff like this from Amazon if I have to rely on it; I've had too many negative lessons from Amazon sellers. I would buy this to power an electric auxiliary so I don't have to start the big motor to get out of the marina, or something like that, but not (yet) as part of my main power system.

It's interesting to see that the Li battery manufacturers seem to have figured out the CCA problem. That may mean that true drop-in replacements will start to be more and more available and affordable.
Post Reply