Page 1 of 1
Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:12 am
by kingtoros
https://www.practical-sailor.com/sailbo ... oat-review
There's a new article on the 26M published on January 8, 2025.
Check it out
... positions the MacGregor 26 as an affordable option for those seeking a versatile, trailerable sailboat with powerboating capabilities. While it may not excel in pure sailing or power boating performance, its versatility, affordability, and ease of use continue to attract buyers looking for a flexible, trailerable option
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 11:04 am
by NiceAft
So King,
How much did it cost you to get a respected sail magazine to write nice things
On the 18th you can tell us all about it.
I did have one question about the noted additions suggested, internal halyards. Question to the forum, has anyone ever done that mod
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 3:42 pm
by kmclemore
Nice article... unusually sympathetic. Some of the facts are completely wrong, of course, but in general they captured the reasons we all own Macs. Thanks for highlighting this.
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 7:26 pm
by pitchpolehobie
Fair article to the 26M and brand -- but doesnt talk about how the 26X was zenith of the Macgregor Yachts. Hopefully they do a followup addressing that.
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 7:38 pm
by NiceAft
I guess you missed this.
The latest version, The MacGregor 26M, introduced several improvements to enhance sailing performance compared to the earlier 26X model.
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:50 am
by dlandersson
Very nice
kingtoros wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:12 am
https://www.practical-sailor.com/sailbo ... oat-review
There's a new article on the 26M published on January 8, 2025.
Check it out
... positions the MacGregor 26 as an affordable option for those seeking a versatile, trailerable sailboat with powerboating capabilities. While it may not excel in pure sailing or power boating performance, its versatility, affordability, and ease of use continue to attract buyers looking for a flexible, trailerable option
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:23 am
by Russ
kmclemore wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 3:42 pmSome of the facts are completely wrong, of course, but in general they captured the
Lots of facts wrong. However, overall a good article.
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 9:17 am
by NiceAft
Don’t underrate a published, positive opinion. As to the wrong facts, MacGregor’s own marketing materials were full of, let’s call them exaggerations. We bought the boat anyway.
I have traveled the world listening to disparaging remarks about Mac’s. I quickly and proudly correct them, and tell them what we can do, and they can’t.
Proud MacGregor owner.
The “M” is for MacGregor, not for
. After all, we don’t want to be confused as Puffin owners, do we
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 12:02 pm
by OverEasy
Hi All!
The article mentions commingled terms relating to “cracks” somehow conflating ‘gelcoat cracks’ and ‘stress cracks’ as if they are the same thing…. They are not.
It’s funny folks griping about ‘thin’ fiberglass and ‘stress’ cracks…. Have they ever looked closely at a similar vintage Boston Whaler or Grady White??? Next time you’re at the ramp, marina or used boats take a good serious look at the back transom to side gunnels corners and near the engine mounts as well as the included angle deck corners of whatever suffices for a cabin. On all the similar vintage ones I’ve looked at, especially on white gelcoat kept uncovered outdoors, I’ve observed “gelcoat” cracking which some have erroneously called ‘stress’ cracks.
NOTE: There is a BIG difference between a gelcoat crack and an actual structural stress crack!
As some already know Gelcoat is a ceramic filled resin coating designed to inhibit Ultra Violet (UV) light from penetrating and damaging the fiberglass bonding resin. UV damages the resin by breaking (cutting) the molecular resin bonds. Gelcoat is nice as it is thick and a generally more durable lasting protection for fiberglass structures as compared to UV blocking paints. (Aside: On fabric cover aircraft a coating of aluminum filled dope (paint) is applied to the natural or synthetic fabric before base priming and finish coatings to inhibit UV degradation of the fabric.)
As gelcoat is a ceramic filled resin top coat it inherently doesn’t have much actual tensile strength (are inherently brittle) so they tend to develop cracks over time, UV exposure and flexing of the fiberglass resin substructure... This does not mean the underlying fiberglass strands and/or bonding resin has cracked. Gelcoat cracks by themselves
are not actual structural damage.
On the aspect of an actual ‘stress’ crack the structural fiberglass strands and bonding resin have actually suffered physical damage and separation weakening the actual structural integrity. Actual ‘stress’ cracks
are structural damage.
Polymer paints tend to be substantially much thinner than gelcoat and more elastic … at least in their early exposure life. The thinness of the paint in most cases allows the polymer paint to stretch with flex action of the underlying material structure. If/when crack do occur in polymer paint films they are by their very nature shallower than gelcoat would be and hence less noticeable. Eventually the thin polymer paint film degrades and wears out due to UV exposure as well as physical wear sooner than a relatively thicker gelcoat.
Now one aspect that Rodger could have spent a bit more at time of manufacture and ensured a much thicker gelcoat was applied …. This would have been very much appreciated by current owners especially on the top shell and flat high exposure & contact wear surfaces… at least we would have!
…. Such as it is……
Best Regards,
Over Easy
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 12:05 pm
by NiceAft
Thank you Dr. Easy.
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 1:56 pm
by kmclemore
NiceAft wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2025 9:17 am
Proud MacGregor owner.
The “M” is for MacGregor, not for
. After all, we don’t want to be confused as Puffin owners, do we
Ray, did you add the “M” or is this something Russ did?
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 2:21 pm
by NiceAft
I added it. I thought it was needed. Artistic license
I hope it has your approval.
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 11:07 pm
by kmclemore
NiceAft wrote: ↑Sat Jan 11, 2025 2:21 pm
I added it. I thought it was needed. Artistic license
I hope it has your approval.
You don't need *my* approval!
Just for the record, though, here is my original design for the MacM...
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 3:49 am
by dlandersson
I thnik that's what was meant about "getting some things wrong"
NiceAft wrote: ↑Fri Jan 10, 2025 7:38 pm
I guess you missed this.
The latest version, The MacGregor 26M, introduced several improvements to enhance sailing performance compared to the earlier 26X model.
Re: Practical Sailor Article
Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:44 am
by NiceAft