Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

A forum for discussion of how to rig and tune your boat or kicker to achieve the best sailing performance.
Globalhobo
Chief Steward
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:22 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Oahu, Hawai'i

Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by Globalhobo »

So, we are rigging our project boat- 2006 26M - and are looking for opinions. We've never sailed on a Macgregor, let alone owned one, but we have loved the idea of one forever. I see the stock set up doesn't come with backstays or topping lifts (although you can buy the topping lift from BWY for cheap). So, whaddaya think? Necessary? And how does that work when you've got a forestay and a backstay and a rotating mast?

Mahaloz.......
User avatar
kadet
Admiral
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 6:51 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Brisbane, Australia. 2008M "Wicked Wave" Yamaha T60

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by kadet »

The :macm: is a B&R rig so does not require a backstay unless you modify the boat with crazy head sails I think there is a Canadian Scotsmen that hangs around here like that 8).

Topping lift is a personal choice,I prefer a boomkicker :)
Globalhobo
Chief Steward
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:22 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Oahu, Hawai'i

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by Globalhobo »

Thanks, Kadet. Does it matter that we will have her rigged full time (we got a slip in a marina down the road and live in an area that allows sailing 365)?
User avatar
kadet
Admiral
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 6:51 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Brisbane, Australia. 2008M "Wicked Wave" Yamaha T60

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by kadet »

Globalhobo wrote:Thanks, Kadet. Does it matter that we will have her rigged full time (we got a slip in a marina down the road and live in an area that allows sailing 365)?
No keel boats like Hunters also use B&R rigs :)
User avatar
grady
Captain
Posts: 946
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:38 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26S
Location: Dallas

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by grady »

kadet wrote: Topping lift is a personal choice,I prefer a boomkicker :)
X2 on the boomkicker! It not only helps keep the boom out of your way it can improve the sail shape in light winds.
dxg4848
First Officer
Posts: 228
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:58 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Cleveland, OH; 2009 26M; 60HP Etec

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by dxg4848 »

Globalhobo wrote:Thanks, Kadet. Does it matter that we will have her rigged full time (we got a slip in a marina down the road and live in an area that allows sailing 365)?

I keep mine in a slip rigged 5 months a year (boating season is short in Ohio).

As far as topping lift I made mine by attaching a fairlead to mast top and this style camcleats to boom end.

http://www.defender.com/product3.jsp?pa ... &id=735626

I connected 1/4" line to mast top with bowline knot and ran line through camcleats fairlead with stop knot at the end.

This way I can fix boom at any heights. Worked great for many seasons.
User avatar
Tomfoolery
Admiral
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 7:42 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Rochester, NY '99X BF50 'Tomfoolery'

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by Tomfoolery »

Unlike the :macx: , a backstay probably would interfere with the main sail of the :macm: , I believe. And it doesn't need one anyway.

A topping lift can be nothing more than a length of line from the top of the mast to the end of the boom, with a means of adjustment so you can hoist it high when the sail is flaked, and dropped so it's not holding up the boom when sailing.

But a boom kicker is a nice way to do the same thing, with the advantages mentioned earlier. And it takes no more space than the vang, which works with it.

Which way you go is probably more about how much you want to spend, with a static topping lift being the cheapest but least functional, and the boomkicker being most expensive but with the most functionality.
User avatar
Russ
Admiral
Posts: 8299
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:01 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Bozeman, Montana "Luna Azul" 2008 M 70hp Suzi

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by Russ »

Tomfoolery wrote:Unlike the :macx: , a backstay probably would interfere with the main sail of the :macm: , I believe. And it doesn't need one anyway.

A topping lift can be nothing more than a length of line from the top of the mast to the end of the boom, with a means of adjustment so you can hoist it high when the sail is flaked, and dropped so it's not holding up the boom when sailing.

But a boom kicker is a nice way to do the same thing, with the advantages mentioned earlier. And it takes no more space than the vang, which works with it.

Which way you go is probably more about how much you want to spend, with a static topping lift being the cheapest but least functional, and the boomkicker being most expensive but with the most functionality.
+1

Simple topping lift is cheap and easy. Her's mine.
2 adjustment points, sailing and higher when not.

Image
User avatar
Tomfoolery
Admiral
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 7:42 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Rochester, NY '99X BF50 'Tomfoolery'

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by Tomfoolery »

RussMT wrote:
Tomfoolery wrote:Unlike the :macx: , a backstay probably would interfere with the main sail of the :macm: , I believe. And it doesn't need one anyway.

A topping lift can be nothing more than a length of line from the top of the mast to the end of the boom, with a means of adjustment so you can hoist it high when the sail is flaked, and dropped so it's not holding up the boom when sailing.

But a boom kicker is a nice way to do the same thing, with the advantages mentioned earlier. And it takes no more space than the vang, which works with it.

Which way you go is probably more about how much you want to spend, with a static topping lift being the cheapest but least functional, and the boomkicker being most expensive but with the most functionality.
+1

Simple topping lift is cheap and easy. Her's mine.
2 adjustment points, sailing and higher when not.

Image
That's almost exactly what mine looks like, but I push the boom up and take a turn around it to shorten it, without ever unclipping it, at least until it's time to break it down for transport. Mine also passes over a cheek block at the top of the mast and runs down to a cleat. I never adjust it, so the block and cleat are not necessary, but the PO did it, and it's not worth the trouble to eliminate some of it, until (maybe) it's time to replace the line. I like simple.
JohnCT
Chief Steward
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 12:13 am
Sailboat: Venture 21

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by JohnCT »

Xxx
Last edited by JohnCT on Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Globalhobo
Chief Steward
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:22 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Oahu, Hawai'i

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by Globalhobo »

You guys are so awesome! We won't be installing the backstay, per your advice, and guess what we realized - we have at least part of the boomkicker! The PO had one istalled but have lost a few (or more) pieces. Looking at our rigging parts (they cut the rigging off! :? ), it looks like they used to have a backstay too.
Thanks for all the advice!
User avatar
dlandersson
Admiral
Posts: 4931
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:00 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Michigan City

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by dlandersson »

Ditto. 8)
dxg4848 wrote:
Globalhobo wrote:Thanks, Kadet. Does it matter that we will have her rigged full time (we got a slip in a marina down the road and live in an area that allows sailing 365)?

I keep mine in a slip rigged 5 months a year (boating season is short in Ohio).

As far as topping lift I made mine by attaching a fairlead to mast top and this style camcleats to boom end.

http://www.defender.com/product3.jsp?pa ... &id=735626

I connected 1/4" line to mast top with bowline knot and ran line through camcleats fairlead with stop knot at the end.

This way I can fix boom at any heights. Worked great for many seasons.
Globalhobo
Chief Steward
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:22 pm
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M
Location: Oahu, Hawai'i

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by Globalhobo »

Well, we went on BWY site to order some parts for the boomkicker and it says, "THIS PRODUCT DOES NOT WORK PROPERLY WITH ROTATING MASTS, DO NOT USE ON 26M" in big, bold letters. Some of you that replied use it...what's the scoop?
FishyFabs
Chief Steward
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:47 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26M

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by FishyFabs »

I got mine from Dowsar Marine the ONTARIO Mac dealer. It came with instructions specifically for the :macm:

Works great and I cannot see any issue. I am sure they can ship it to you.
User avatar
Tomfoolery
Admiral
Posts: 6135
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 7:42 am
Sailboat: MacGregor 26X
Location: Rochester, NY '99X BF50 'Tomfoolery'

Re: Opinions: Backstay and topping lift necessary?

Post by Tomfoolery »

FishyFabs wrote:I got mine from Dowsar Marine the ONTARIO Mac dealer. It came with instructions specifically for the :macm:

Works great and I cannot see any issue. I am sure they can ship it to you.
I had to use the search function to find it on Dowsar's site, but it was there. Different part number for X and M units. Exchange rate is also quite favorable right now at about 1.34CD to 1.00USD.

http://dowsar.com/cgi-bin/online/storepro.php

Enter 'boom' into the search box to quickly get the page. It wouldn't give me a direct link to the part.

I've never been to their store, even though I've been to Toronto a few time. Maybe I should stop there on my way to the MMOR next year, just-because. :wink:
Post Reply